Gentile is a misnomer
“We run into the same problem with the word “Gentile,” which seems to be the illegitimate stepchild of the word “jew.” Strictly speaking, the words “jew” and Gentile are not mistranslations, because they are not even translations; they are transliterations or Anglicizations (that is, making a foreign word appear in English form, as is done with most all proper nouns). (and worse still, they are second-hand Anglicizations).
One of the problems with the word misrendered “Gentile” is that it is not a proper noun but a generic, collective noun. It should not be translated “Gentile” (a misleading word), and should NEVER be used in reference to a single individual because the word exists only as a collective noun. (This difference can be understood by realizing the distinction between the words person and people. Clearly the world person is an individual noun; while people is a collective noun (which itself can also exist in the plural; for example, many peoples).
In Hebrew, the word mistranslated “Gentile” is gowy (singular) [#1484 (ETH-nos)] or ethne (plural). The problem appears to have arisen with the Latin Vulgate in which these Hebrew and Greek words were rendered into Latin as gentilis, from which we were unfortunate enough to be given the new and inaccurate English word “Gentile.” A similar miscarriage of “translation” occurred with the word “jew.”
Most people erroneously think the word “Gentile” means, anyone who is not a “jew.” To the contrary, the words “goy” and “ethne” (improperly rendered “Gentile”) are generic nouns with no distinct racial racial connotation whatsoever. These words simply mean “nation” or “people.” These words should never be translated as heathen: that meaning can only be implied through context. Further, “goy” and “ethne” are collective nouns: One individual cannot constitute a “Gentile”, even as one individual cannot be referred to as a people. -There can only be one group of people (who are Gentile), or different groups of people (who constitute Gentiles); that is, if “Gentile” is to be used to convey the true meaning of “goy” and “ethnos.”
Since the word “Gentile” is misleading and inaccurate, it should be discarded.
Even as the words “goy” and ethnos” cannot refer to a single individual but only to a group, so also these words cannot categorically refer to any single race of people exclusively (i.e., only “non-jews”). For example, if you and I were Germans visiting China, the Chinese could refer to us as goy/ethnos (if thet were speaking ancient Hebrew or Greek). If two Frenchmen also accompanied us, the Chinese could refer to us all as goyim/ethne. Likewise, if a few Chinamen visited us in our native Germany, we also would refer to them all as goy/ethnos; if two Japanese accompanied these Chinamen, we would refer to them all as goyim/ethne. Goy and ethnos are generic terms meaning simply “people” or “nation.” Whether these words refer to natives (of one’s own race, or of another race) must be determined from the context of any given biblical passage.
It should be understood by all that the word “flock” cannot refer to one sheep, but only to a group of sheep. Further, it hsould be understood by all that the word flock cannot be used exclusively in reference to sheep alone, to the exclusion of all other forms of animal life: for it can also be used in reference to goats, ducks, geese, etc. In fact, in Scripture, the main Hebrew words used for cattle [#4735 (mik-NEH); #6629 (tsone); #7716 (seh)] themselves do not mean “cows” exclusively but can be used of any form of livestock: cows, sheep, goats, rams, etc. Interestingly enough, the Hebrew word “goy” can also refer to a troop of animals or a flight of locusts; although to my knowledge it is not used this way anywhere in Scripture.
The “jews” have taught us that goyim (“Gentiles”) means “non-jews.” Whether they have lied to us or actually believe this is irrelevant. If they actually believe this themselves, then it is clear that they do not even understand the true Hebrew tongue, the original language of God’s Israel people. Modern Hebrew is not the same as ancient Hebrew- the alphabets are even entirely different (as different as the English alphabet is from the Arabs’ alphabet).”
Hebrew means Colonizer
“The very name of our progenitor, Heber, means ‘colonizer.’ We are destined to be the greatest colonizing race of all time, among whom [YHVH] divided the nations…”
Frederick Haberman pg 69 Tracing Our Ancestors
Brackets mine. *Also changed the tense of a few words for clarity.
Jew is a Misnomer
“In Scripture, the word “jew” is most often used to great confusion. The word “jew” (as many other seemingly racially indicative words) is not always as clearly understood as one would think. In fact, it is not a legitimate word.
The word “jew” never appeared in the 1611 King James Bible, nor the Geneva Bible of 1599, nor any of Shakespeare’s plays, nor in any English Bible or any English literature before or during the Victorian Era.
In fact, the word “jew,” according to many sources, did not appear in the English language until 1620. The word used before this time was “Iewe” (pronounced hew-ee). The reason is that the word “jew” is not to be found in the original Hebrew or Greek Scriptures. [The word “Iewe” should not have been used either. This shall be explained shortly.]
According to the esteemed Colonel Curtis B. Dall (Franklin D. Roosevelt’s son-in-law), in his Israel’s Five Trillion Dollar Secret (1977), the word “jew” did not exist until 1755. The word itself was a corruption from the Latin Iudaeus, which meant “Judean.” It underwent numerous forms, from “Giwis, Gyues, Geus, Iuys, Iows, Iews,” and finally “jews.” It appeared for the first time in an English Bible, when a mass-printing was made of a new 18th-century edition that “updated” the 14th-century translation. This special edition was then distributed throughout the English-speaking world to people who had never before owned a Bible. Dall also asserts that the word “Iewe,” or “jew,” when first translated in the Scriptures, referred only to the ancient Judeans of the Bible and not the modern “jew” (pp. 28-31)
In the Hebrew Old Testament, the word mistranslated “jew” in Scripture is Judahite [#3064 (ye-hoo-DEE)]; in the Greek New Testament the word used is Judean [#2453 (ee-oo-DAH-yos)];. These two words can refer to someone who was:
(1) racially of the Tribe of Judah,
(2) a resident in the geographic land mass of Judah, or
(3) a political subject of the later Roman-controlled district of Judea.
Christ warned us that tares (non-Israelites) had been sown among the wheat (Israel) and the goats (non-Israelites) had slipped in among the sheep (Israel), which would one day be separated (Matthew 13:25-30; 25:32-33). Christ told us, by their fruit you shall know them (Luke 6:43-44). Therefore, to be able to discern when the word “jew” in Scripture refers to a true Israelite or a Canaanite impostor, each passage must be studied in context.
In the Apocryphal book The Story of Susanna, this point was powerfully proved when young Daniel exposed two immoral Canaanites who were masquerading as true Judeans, who lied attempting to condemn and innocent Israelite woman to death because she would not consent to their sexual advances.”
Abiri is the Ancient term for Hebrews
“The whole story of the Exodus of Israel and their entrance into Canaan has been questioned by critical Orientalists, because they could find no trace of their name in Palestine; yet Dr. Langdon has found recently from the Tel el Amarna tablets and from other excavations that a people by the name of Habiru or Abiri entered from Palestine about that time and destroyed Jericho—the term Abiri being the ancient name for ‘Hebrews.’”
Frederick Haberman- Tracing Our Ancestors pg 67
Abraham, Adam, Isaac, Noah, etc were not Judah
Abraham was not a Judahite nor Noah, Jacob or Adam.
The Judahites cannot be all Israel for we see Israel making war with Ahaz king of Judah.
This wicked Ahaz who had become king at 20 sacrificed his children to Molech just as members of our race do to this day though in Planned Parenthood centers. See how the terminology has changed. The serpent seed is very tricky and instead of passing our children through fire killing them they now kill our children in the womb and call it person decisions, planning parenthood, etc but never murder as it actually is.
Anyways, Rezin king of Syria or the Arameans. (Aram being grandson of Nahor.) Together with Pekah son of Remaliah, king of ISRAEL went to Jerusalem and besieged Ahaz king of Judah.
Notice there was king of Judah and King of Israel. This is because the Israelites all children of Jacob had split into two kingdoms.
Thus to call the Israelites Jews or to even call them as a whole Judahites is a terrible choice of words. Only Benjamin and Judah were of the tribe of Judah. This leaves out the majority of Israel and to call them Jews confuses them with their enemies today the Edomites.
Some say that they refer to a people as Jews because they all believed in Judaism. Such a statement is absurd to apply to Ancient Israelites. No, they followed Scripture though rebellious.
Judaism is a collection of Edomite lore which calls Mary/Miriam a whore, seeks to justify God’s laws to allow sodomy and pedophilia, and you don’t even want to know what Judaism says about Christ. This primary text of Judaism is secretive to and large degree and wasn’t even applicable to the ancient Israelites as Mary/Miriam wasn’t born yet let alone Christ.
Adam means white
The word “man” is found over 2700 times in the KJV Bible. There are 16 different Hebrew words with many definitions used for the word man and surprisingly most of them DO NOT MEAN the White Race. So why are all of the Different Hebrew words translated as “man”? The word “man” comes from the Hebrew word ‘adam, H120, which is a noun. The root of ‘adam is also ‘adam, H119, a verb, meaning ruddy, rosy, blushing, the ability to show blood in the face = THE WHITE RACE. The Pronoun is ‘Adam, H121. And since Noah’s ancestry was perfect (no race mixing) all the way back to ‘Adam, that would make Shem WHITE. And since Shem was White, Ham and Japheth would also be White.
Anti-Semitism for criticism?
Why is it anti-Semitism to criticize certain Jews? It’s not anti-Italian to be criticize the mafia.
Anti-Semitism a crime in Soviet Russia
The Jewish Voice in January, 1942, stated: “The Jewish people will never forget that the Soviet Union was the first country — and as yet the only country in the world — in which Anti-Semitism is a crime.”
Anti-Semitism a crime in Soviet Russia
The Congress Bulletin (Publication of the American Jewish Congress) stated:
Anti-Semitism was classed as counter-revolution and the severe punishments meted out for acts of Anti-Semitism were the means by which the existing order protected its own safety.
Anti-Semitism a crime in Soviet Russia
…Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the Soviet Union. Active Anti-Semites are punished by death under law.
Gregor Aronson. (1949). Soviet Russia and the Jews. New York: American Jewish League Against Communism.
Are Jews Israelites?
Jews are not Israelites. The very term Jew is a modern word. Jews are Edomites by their own admission (“Edom is in ‘Modern Jewry’” Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p.41.) A Jew is also not even a Judahite (which is a tribe of Israel). Not one Jew can trace pure descent to Judah. The very first Israelite was Jacob Israel. His pure blooded children are the only who can be called Israelites or Judahites and Judah/Benjamin can claim the kingdom of Judah. On a side note there was also a territory called Judea. The people who lived there were Judeans and were of many different ethnicities.
Balfour a Jew
Balfour was actually a secret Jew
Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew.
Capitalism or Communism: What’s the difference?
A Jewish journalist (M. Waldman) who knew Trotsky from the period of his stay in Vienna (“when he used to play chess with Baron Rothschild in Cafe Central and frequent Cafe Daily to read the press there”).
Nedava, J. (1971). Trotsky and the Jews. Philadelphia. Jewish Publication
Change from biological to cultural anthropology
“This new anthropology was influenced by the likes of Jewish anthropologist Franz Boas. “Boas and his followers pushed the notion that there was no evidence that the races were actually different in hereditary capacities – all of the observed differences were said to be the result of historical accidents and cultural-learning.“
-Professor Glayde Whitney –Return to Reality about Race, p.2.
“This concept was popularized by one of Boas’s students, another Jew, Montague Francis Ashley-Montague (whose real name was Israel Ehrenburg), who wrote Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race.
The promise was, “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.” Genesis 49:10.
“Nobody has held that Scepter from the time of Zedekiah until Christ. Besides, that Scepter was a literal Scepter; and Christ’s Scepter has been a spiritual one, at least until today….”
“Ought ye not to know that Yahweh God of Israel gave the kingdom over Israel to David for ever, even to him and to his sons by a covenant of salt?” II Chronicles 13:5
“David shall rule over Israel forever.”
“Then I will establish the throne of thy kingdom upon Israel forever, as I promised to David thy father, saying, there There shall not fail thee a man upon the throne of Israel.”
[Man rather than God seems significant. ]
“Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie to David. His seed shall endure forever, and as the throne before me. It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah.”
“As the sun endures, so long shall that Covenant last; and as the sun has been shining every day since David’s time that Covenant must be still in force, and the House of David must still be ruling over Israel.”
“Irish historians are unanimous that about 580 B.C. there arrived in Ulyster a notable man, a patriarch or saint, accompanied by an Eastern princess, and a lesser person by the name of Simon Brach, or Barech. This party brought with them several remarkable things about which Ireland’s songs and legends clustwr; those things were a harp (David’s harp) , and a wonderful stone — the Stone of Destiny– the Lia Phail. According to many traditions, Jeremiah took the princesses to Spain, where one of them married a prince of Zaragossa. With the other princess he arrived in Ulster some time later. Irish tradition tells us that Jeremiah married the princess Tamar Tephi to Eochaidh, the Heremon, or head king of Ireland, after the latter had embraced the worship of the true [Yahweh].
Jeremiah…became the patriarch of Ireland, and is the original ‘St. Patrick’. …
The princess Tephi is said to be buried in a burial mound, the Great Mergesh, on the Hill of Tara. Several attempts have been made by archeologists to enter that mound, but every attempt has been frustrated by the neighboring Irish peasantry with guns and pitchforks. That mound Is sacred to the Irish people, but some day soon it will be opened, and speculation Is rife as to what It will contain….Jeremiah himself is said to be buried near the ruins of Devenish Abbey on the Isle of Devenish in Lower Lough Erne, near Inniskillen, County Fermanagh. ”
From Frederick Habermans Tracing Our Ancestors
Did the Constitution Include Negroes?
“The change in public opinion and feeling in relation to the African race, which has taken place since the adoption of the Constitution, cannot change its construction and meaning… The words ‘people of the United States’ and ‘citizens’ are synonymous terms, and mean the same thing…The question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement [Negroes] compose a portion of this people, and are constitute members of this sovereignty? We think they are not intended to be included….and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race… and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and Government might choose to grant them.
-Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 Howard (60 U.S.) 393
European Royals are from Judah
“A study of Rev. Milner’s Genealogical Chart will show that most of the royal houses of Europe, and the multitudinous lines that have branched off from them in the course of over three thousand years, are of the tribe of Judah; and none of them are Jews. ‘Judah is a lion’s whelp, ‘ said the dying Jacob. Every noble house of Europe that has a lion on its coat of arms is descended from that line. ‘Judah thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise; thy father’s children shall bow down before thee.’ To Judah belonged the Sceptre, and the sons of Judah have held a good many scepters, ruling over the descendants of the other tribes. So far we are not yet dealing with the line of Pharez that entered Palestine, from which descended the Judahites after the division of Solomon’s kingdom, and the house of David, which ended it’s temporal rule in Palestine with jehoiachin .. in 585 B. C.”
If Called a Supremacist
Recognizing that there are intrinsic differences in culture, behavior, tradition, and even genetics among the different races does not make one a supremacist. The truth be told, most people naturally prefer the association of their own racial or ethnic group, and frankly, most people think of their group as the best. What constitutes supremacism is when one group tries to control or be supreme over another.
Is Yoga Satanic?
Jewish Divide and Conquer
Dr. Stephen Steinlight, the former officer of the American Jewish Com- mittee whom I quoted earlier, puts it in amazingly blunt terms:
For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jew- ish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.
Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies.
Disgusting Jewish Holiday
Another important Jewish holiday is the Feast of Lots, called Purim. The Random House Dictionary of the English Language describes it as follows:
Purim A Jewish festival marked chiefly by the reading of the book of Esther and eating of hamantaschen, that is celebrated on the 14th day of Adar in com- memoration of the deliverance of the Jews in Persia from destruction by Haman.128
The festival celebrates the Jewish massacre of thousands of Persians along with their Prime Minister Haman and his 10 sons. It even includes the symbolic eating of the supposed anti-Semite’s ears (Haman’s ears — hamantaschen) in the form of three-sided cookies. Another of the favored Purim foods is Kreplach, which are dough pockets again shaped in a triangle to denote Haman’s ears, but these snacks are filled with chopped meat, symbolizing the beaten flesh of Haman. Another Purim celebration has Jews beating willow branches in the synagogues as they imagine themselves flogging Haman. The following description of these practices comes from a Jewish culture organization called Jewish Art in Context, but is found in numerous books about Jewish culture and religious holy days. The second description is from a Jewish cooking guide called “Bon Appetit.”
c. Special Delicacies
1. “Haman Taschen” (Oznei Haman = Haman’s Ears).
2. “Kreplach”: chopped meat covered with dough, also triangular in shape. The name has received a popular etymology: “Kreplach are eaten only on days on which there is both hitting and eating: Yom Kippur eve — the custom of Kaparot, Hoshanna Rabba — the beating the willow branches, Purim — the (symbolical) beating of Haman.”
The reason Kreplach are eaten on Purim is interesting (if a bit of a stretch). Kreplach is also traditional for Yom Kippur … and for Hoshannah Rabah (the seventh day of Sukkot).
On these days it was traditional for there to be some sort of beat- ing. On Yom Kippur in ancient times, men would be flogged before Yom Kippur and we beat the willow branches on Hoshannah Rabah.
On Purim, we beat out the name of Haman. So Kreplach became traditional for Purim. (Phillip Goldwasser from “Bon Appetit”)
We are not hyphenated Jews; we are Jews with no qualifications or reservations. We are simply aliens; we are a foreign people in your midst, and, we emphasize, we wish to stay that way. There is a wide gap between you and us, so wide that no bridge can be laid across. Your spirit is alien to us; your myths, legends, habits, customs, traditions and national heritage, your religious and national shrines [Christianity], your Sundays and holidays. . . they are all alien to us. The history of your triumphs and defeats, your war songs and battle hymns, your heroes and their mighty deeds, your national ambitions and aspirations, they are all alien to us. The boundaries of your lands cannot restrict our movements, and your border clashes are not of our concern. Far over and above the frontiers and boundaries of your land stand our Jewish unity. . . . Whosoever calls the foreign [Gentile] land a fatherland is a traitor to the Jewish people. . . . A loyal Jew can never be other than a Jewish patriot…. We recognize a national unity of Diaspora Jews, no matter in which country they may reside. Therefore, no boundaries can restrain us in pursuing our own Jewish Policy.
Influential modern Zionist writer Jakob Klatzkin addressing the world at large in his 1921 German-language book Krisis und Entscheidung (Crisis and Decision)
[prominent Zionist historian, Simon Dubnow, in Foundation of National Judaism in 1906.]Assimilation is common treason against the banner and ideals of the Jewish people. . . . But one can never ‘become’ a member of a natural group, such as a family, a tribe, or a nation…A Jew, on the other hand, even if he happened to be born in France and still lives there, in spite of all this, he remains a member of the Jewish nation, and whether he likes it or not, whether he is aware or unaware of it, he bears the seal of the historic evolution of the Jewish nation.
Dubnow, S. (1906). Foundation Of National Judaism. Translated From Die
Grundlagen Des Nationaljudentums. S.M. Dubnow. Berlin : Jüdischer Verlag.
Jewish Manipulation of the Darker Races
“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negros to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”
[Israel Cohen, A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p.8559, June 7, 1957]
A former member of Israel’s Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the
system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to “Nuremberg laws” of Nazi Germany:
…the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Judaism within the State of Israel.
– Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws Of The State Of Israel. New York. p.156.
Jewish Supremacism- Shiksa
Another major Jewish publication, the Jewish Chronicle, in an article called “Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words,“ reveals that the Jewish word for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word shiksa — meaning “whore,” from the Hebrew root, sheigetz (“abomination”). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, meaning “little female abomination.”
Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully And Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish
Chronicle. May 17.
Jewish Supremacism- Testimony by Jew
Dr. Stephen Steinlight, one of the leading Jews in America, who wrote these comments in October of 2001. Steinlight is no minor Jewish figure. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs (domestic policy) in the most powerful and respected Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. Steinlight confesses the rampant Jewish supremacism and disloyalty to America that permeates the American Jewish community.
I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one.
David Ben Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, often called the “George Washington of Israel,” said specifically that he believed in the “moral and intellectual superiority” of the Jewish people.
Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It’s Okay to be the Chosen People. Reform Judaism. May.
admitted terrorist Menachem Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Begin brags in his book, The Revolt, about the massacre of over two hundred men, women, and children at Dier Yassin.
Jews are a Race
The leader of American Jewry in the 1930s, Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, said it succinctly in this dramatic statement, “Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a race.”
-Wise (1938). Dr. Wise Urges Jews To Declare Selves As Such. New York
Herald Tribune. June 13. p.12.
Jews are a Race
Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to Jewish group in southern California said: “If Israel had not come into existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race wouldn’t have survived…I stand before you and say you must strengthen your commitment to Israel.”
(Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front page)
Jews are a Race
An editorial entitled “Some Other Race” in the New York weekly Forward (A very prestigious Jewish publication) urges Jews to list themselves on the U.S. Government census form as a race. It goes on to suggest: “… On question eight [of the form, which asks about race], you might consider doing what more than one member of our redaktzia [editorial staff] has done: checking the box ‘some other race’ and writing in the word ‘Jew’.
in the March 17, 2000, issue
Jews are a Race
Charles Bronfman, a main sponsor of the $210 million “Birthright Israel,” an organization specifically committed to preventing inter- marriage between Jews and Gentiles, expressed the need to preserve the Jewish genetic character as expressed in the Jewish DNA. Bronfman is brother of Edgar Bronfman, Sr., president of the World Jewish Congress. He said, “…you’re losing a lot — losing the kind of feeling you have when you know [that] throughout the world there are people who somehow or other have the same kind of DNA that you have.”
(“Project Reminds Young Jews of Heritage,” The Washington Post, Jan. 17,
2000, p. A19)
Jews are a Race
Judaism can have nothing in common with Germanism. If we go by the standards of race, history, and culture, and the Germans do have the right to prevent the Jews from intruding on the affairs of their volk. . . The same demand I raise for the Jewish volk as against the German. . . . The Jews are divided into two categories, those who admit they belong to a race distinguished by a history thousands of years old, and those who don’t. The latter are open to the charge of dishonesty.
[Before the Second World War Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Zionist Organization, urged German Jews to immigrate to Palestine, using those blunt words:]
Jews are a Race
“Jews are a distinct nationality, whatever his country, his station, or his shade of belief, he is necessarily a member.”
[Judge Louis Brandeis, a Zionist who sat on the American Supreme Court at a speech before the Menorah Society at Columbia University.]
Jews are Edomites
“Edom is in modern Jewry.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia (1925) Vol. 5, p.41.
Jews are not white
“We are not white symbolically, we are not white literally… we should not permit ourselves to be lumped together with white America…”
Professor Leonard J. Fein (political scientist) (Jewish Post & Opinion, June 28, 1968).
Jews ban math
Pious Jews object to the international plus sign for it is a cross, and it may in their opinion, influence little children to convert to Christianity. Another “explanation” holds; it would then be difficult to “educate” them to spit on the cross, if they become used to it in their arithmetic exercises. Until the early 1970s two different sets of arithmetic books were used in Israel. One for the secular schools, employing an inverted “T” sign. In the early ’70’s the religious fanatics “converted” the Labour Party to the great danger of the cross in arithmetic, and from that time, in all Hebrew elementary schools (and now many high schools as well) the international plus sign has been forbidden. (From Israel Shahak statement on the Jewish hatred of Christianity) reprinted by Radio Islam.
Judaism is from the Pharisees/ Jews are Pharisees
“Pharisaism became Talmudism… But the spirit of the Ancient Pharisee survives unaltered. When the Jew… studies the Talmud, he is actually repeating the arguments used in the Palestinian academies. From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to Poland, Russia and eastern Europe generally, ancient Pharisaism has wandered…”
(The Pharisees (1938), by Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, Forward, Vol. 1)
Judaism is from the Pharisees/ Jews are Pharisees
“The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.”
(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia; “Pharisaism;” p.474)
Karl Marx Jewish
Marx was the grandson of a rabbi and “the descendant of Talmudic scholars for many generations.”
Chicago Jewish Sentinel. (1975). Inside Judaica. October 30.
Mamzer means mongrel bastard
“Evidently it is rather easy for some people to hear a definition of a word, or actually define a word for themselves, that allows them to remain comfortable with some wicked idea, and they use their device to support a lie, and then they spread that false definition and that lie without shame. But these people even claim Strong’s Concordance as their authority on the matter. I have encountered this recently from several people, and found a couple of them lying in regard to the word bastard. Evidently some Jew from Chicago, pretending to be a Christian Identity pastor, has been telling people that a bastard, a mamzer in Hebrew, is specifically a person “born of a Jewish father and a heathen mother”, and nothing else. I have never heard anything so absurd.
If that were the case, where Yahweh tells the Philistines in Zechariah chapter 9 that “a bastard shall dwell in Ashdod”, then it would be evident that Yahweh was advocating race-mixing among Israelite men. That is basically blasphemous, to insist that Yahweh would advocate such a thing. But that is only the beginning of the problems with their definition.
However it is simply not the case. Let’s read the whole definition. James Strong in his entry for the Hebrew word mamzer (Strong’s # 4464) says that the word is “from an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. born of a Jewish father and a heathen mother…” and of course Strong evidently thought that the Israelites were Jews, and that Jews were Israelites, which is not true. But where he said “i.e.” he was only giving an example, since i.e. is short for the Latin phrase id est, which is literally “that is” and which is a phrase used in English to state something further which clarifies a previous statement. So the sentence “born of a Jewish father and a heathen mother” is not part of the definition of mamzer, but was instead included by Strong only as an explanation of what a bastard is, which is a mongrel. A mongrel is generally defined as “a dog of no definable type or breed”, or as “any other animal resulting from the crossing of different breeds or types”, or regarding people, as “a person of mixed descent.”
So the word bastard comes from a Hebrew verb which is not found in Scripture (for which reason Strong called it an “unused root”) but which means to alienate. If we read the accounts of Jacob and Esau in Genesis, it is evident that Esau’s having taken foreign wives caused him to be alienated from his mother, and ultimately for that reason his mother made certain that Esau was alienated from his birthright. So Paul, writing in Hebrews many years later, called Esau a profane man and a fornicator. As Jude defines fornication, it is the pursuit of different flesh, and that is what Esau did.
A bastard is illegitimate, because the Law of God defines marriage as a union between a man and woman who are of the same bone and the same flesh, which is in the law in Genesis chapter 2. Kind after kind also being in the law, when a man takes a wife who is not of his flesh he is committing fornication, and if he has children within such a union, he is creating bastards. And the same law for the man also applies to a woman who would do such a thing. Anyone who tries to redefine the word bastard as anything other than a mixed-race individual is a liar and a double-minded man, a man with an agenda and no care for the truth.”
-William Finck The Prophecy of Zechariah – Part 6: Burdens and Bastards
Martin Luther on the Jews
They have been taught so much deadly hatred against the Gen- tiles by their parents and Rabbis since their earliest youth and continue to feed their hate during all the years of their lives, and this hatred has saturated their very blood and flesh, fills the very mar- row of their bones and has become inseparable from their whole being. (Weimar 53, pgs. 482-483)
Their Talmud and their Rabbis teach them that a murder shall not be regarded as a sin whenever a Jew kills a Gentile, but only if a Jew murders a brother in Israel. Neither is it a sin to break an oath sworn to a Gentile. . .The Jews of our days still keep to these doc- trines and follow the example of their fathers, taking every opportunity to practice their deliberately false interpretation of the Lord’s Word, their avariciousness, their usury, their thefts, their murders, and teaching their children to do likewise. (W. 53, 489- 490-91)
Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with such sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a Satanic breed. (W. 32, pg. 286)
You should know that the Jews blaspheme and violate the name of our Savior day for day…they are our public enemies and incessantly blaspheme our Lord Jesus Christ, they call our Blessed Virgin Mary a harlot and her Holy Son a bastard and to us they give the epithet of Changelings and abortions. If they could kill us all they would gladly do so, in fact, many murder Christians. . . (Luther’s last sermon, a few days before his death in February 1546) (Erlanger 62, pg. 189)
Midgard Serpent is Satan
The Midgard/earth serpent is Satan and 3000 BC the cross is considered to be the ‘Key of the Life to Come’ the Crux Ansata and the Universal Symbol of Divine Victory over the Serpent.
The story of Achilles Heel is a latter day conception of the serpent bruising the heel of the Messiah.
Tracing Our Ancestors Frederick Haberman
Newt Gingrich Panders to the Jews
In early 1995, Congressman Newt Gingrich, Speaker of the House, fired his newly appointed congressional librarian, Christina Jeffrey. He fired her for having once suggested that history students, when studying the Holocaust, should also study the German point of view on the subject. She was fired in spite of her high standing in her profession and notwithstanding her long and cozy relations with the powerful Jewish ADL
Kurtzman, Daniel. (1995). Ousted House Historian Seeks Restitution and a
Straight Record. Jewish Telegraphic Agency. October 31.
Odin is not from Scandinavia
“The reputed common ancestor, leader, or deity of Goths, Saxons, and Danes, was one, Odin. The Danes also claim as an ancestor, or leader, a renowned warrior named Dan, and hence their country was called Damme-merk, or Dan’s-land.
The settlements of the Dannans, or Danes, in Denmark and Norway seem to have been made in very remote times, for the Irish colony of Dannans are said to have visited Denmark first, and to have found their compatriots and namesakes there before them in some strength with considerable towns. It is characteristic of these early Dannans that, wherever we read of them, we hear of their establishing schools; and being regarded, of course for their superior knowledge, as magicians by the simpler aborigines of the countries to which they came.
Odin is a historical and mythical personage. It was a name also often assumed by Danish chieftains. In Norse it is Ottin, in Gothic Wuotan, the Lombards wrote Wodan, Old Saxons Wodan, Westphalian Saxons Godan, or Gudan (Grimm; Moore’s Pillar Stones of Scotland, 151, and Sharon Turner, Anglo-Sax., vol. i., p. 100)
“Odin’s capital, Asgard, was supposed to be between the Euxine and Caspian Seas… The chronicle of the Swedish kings commences with an account of a people on the east of the river Tana-Quisl (the Tana-quisl is the Dana-strom, or Danube). The people were governed by a pontiff-king, Odin. These people introduced the worshop of Odin into Denmark and Sweden (Moore’s Pillar Stones, p. 149; see Traces de Buddhisme en Norvege, par M.C.A. Holmboe, Professeur de Langues Orientales en Universitie Royale de Norvege).”
From the time of the defection of the Ten Tribes under Jeroboam, the kings of Israel seem to have constituted themselves pontiff-kings. They made the priests, and were priests themselves. (See I Kings 13:1,33) And there, in Media, in the exact position assigned to the headquarters of the Ten Tribes (II Esdras 13:43), south of the sources, or “narrow passages,” of the Euphrates, may be found, in the best modern maps, the district or province Asgerd, with its capital of the same name, corresponding, as well as can fairly be conceived, with Asgard, the traditional gome and palace of Odin, “near the Euxine and Caspian Seas.”
The position of Asgerd, in the Prussian map which I possess, is about 30 miles north of Lake Van.
In Norwar and Denmark, as in Scotland and Ireland, Baal worship flourished – that old mark of Phoenician company, that pet of Jezebel, wife of King Ahab and daughter of Eth-baal, King of Sidon. (I Kings 16:30,31)
Here also we find almost national the old badge which everywhere we have observed attaching to the Danai, or Danites – the serpent. Numerous Danish families bear, and it is the most common device in the ancient Danish jewellery. ”
-DAN THE PIONEER OF ISRAEL by COLONEL J.C. Gawler 1880
On the word Jew not being legitimate
“In Scripture, the word “jew” is most often used to great confusion. The word understood (as seemingly racially indicative words) is not always as clearly understood as one would think. In fact, it is not a legitimate word. The word “jew” never appeared in the 1611 King James Bible or any English literature before or during the Victorian Era. In fact, the word “jew,” according to many sources, did not appear in the English language until 1620. The word used before this time was “Iewe” (pronounced hew-ee). The reason is that the word “jew” is not to be found in the original Hebrew or Greek Scriptures.
According to the esteemed Colonel Curtis B. Dall (Franklin D. Roosevelt’s son-in-law), in his Israel’s Five Trillion Dollar Secret (1977), the word “jew” did not exist until 1775. The word itself was a corruption from the Latin Iudawus, which meant “Judean.” [NOT JEW] It underwent numerous forms, from “Giwis, Gyues, Geus, Iuys, Iows, Iews,” and finally “jews.” It appeared for the first time in an English Bible, when a mass-printing was made of a new 18th-century edition that “updated” the 14th-century translation. This special edition was then distributed throughout the English-speaking world to people who had never before owned a Bible. Dall also assers that the word “Iewe,” or “jew,” when first translated in the Scriptures, referred only to the ancient Judeans of the Bible and not the modern “jew” (pp. 28-31)
In the Hebrew Old Testament, the word mistranslated “jew” in Scripture is Judahite [#3064 (yeh-hoo-DEE)]; in the Greek New Testament the word used is Judean [#2453 (ee-oo-DAH-yos)]. These two words can refer to someone who was:
(1) racially of the Tribe of Judah,
(2) a resident in the geographic land mass of Judah, or
(3) a political subject of the later Roman-controlled district of Judea.
Christ warned us that tares (non-Israelites) had been sown among the wheat (Israel) and that goats (non-Israelites) had slipped in among the sheep (Israel), which would one day be separated (Matthew 13:25-30; 25:32-33). Christ told us, by their fruit you shall know them (Luke 6:43-44). Therefore, to be able to discern when the word “jew” in Scripture refers to a true Israelite or a Canaanite impostor, each passage must be studied in context.
In the Apocryphal book The Story of Susanna, this point was powerfully proved when young Daniel exposed two immoral Canaanites who were masquerading as true Judeans, who lied attempting to condemn an Israelite woman to death because she would not consent to their sexual advances.”
Origin of Norse Mythology
PROF. BUGGE ON THE ORIGIN OF NORSE MYTHOLOGY.
Prof. BUGGE, of Christiania, the highest living authority on Teutonic mythology and Eddaic criticism, has lately read a paper on the origin of Norse mythology before the Christiania Academy of Science, an abstract of which has appeared in the Aftenbladet (November 3). The results of Prof. Bugge’s investigations are of so startling a character, and yet so certain in their general outlines, that a short notice of them cannot but be welcome.
Prof Bugge maintains that, of the whole mass of mythological and epic traditions handed down in the two Eddas, only a small fraction is common Germanic, the great bulk of it being of a foreign origin, based on tales and poems heard by the Vikings from the Englishmen and Irishmen. The ultimate sources of these English-Celtic legends are of two kinds:– (1) the Old Greek-Roman mythology; (2) Jewish[sic Judean)- Christian Bible legends of various degrees of apocryphalyness. The Norse cosmic legends of the beginning and the end of the world are mainly taken from the second class. The adaptation of the Greek legends shows a complete ignorance of their connexion with one another and with the whole body of the mythology, and the most incongruous details are often blended under a single personage. Even when an original Teutonic god or hero is preserved, such as Thor, most of the stories told of him are of Greek origin- the Thor-legends, for instance, being taken from those about Hercules and Zeus. The Geirrodr is Geryon, Hymir is Oineus, Utgarda-loki is Acheleos, Thor’s mother Lodyn is Latona. In his fishing for the serpent we have the Christian Leviathan. Loki is Lucifer. So also with the heroes. Orvar-odd (=”arrow-point”) is a blending together of Hercules and Philoctetes; the sons of Arngrim are the Argonauts (Argo-nautae made into Argo-nati). Angantyr, one of these sons, has got his name from another cycle; the name is Centaur, with the Celtic article in- prefixed. The prophetess Vala is Sibylla, through Sivulla the si-being identified with the Old English article se, fem. Seo—a froof that part of this mythology must have been fully developed on English ground.
The full analysis of the myth of Balder is especially interesting. Its earliest form, as preserved by Saxo, is mainly Greek, founded on the story of Achilles and Patroclus, who are fused into one person. Balder, like Achilles, is partially invulnerable, and both owe this gift to their mothers. Hodr, the slayer of Balder, is described by Saxo as a young and handsome son of a king, endowed with many accomplishments, just as Paris, who, in the later Greek-Roman traditions, shoots Achilles, is described by Homer. Bugge’s identification of Hodr with Paris is a brilliant piece of conjecture, which we would gladly see confirmed by further evidence. Hod(r) signifies “war,” and is identical, both in etymology and meaning, with the Celtic oath. As initial p drops off in Irish, Paris could be adopted only in the form of Aris. This word was compounded with the name Ares, and translated into Cath, whence Hod. This latters wife in Saxo is Nanna, who in later tradition becomes Balder’s wife. Nanna is evidently Oinone, Paris’s first wife. In Saxo’s version she causes a long war, being confounded with Helen. When the ship on which Balder’s body was to be burnt was launched, the gods had to seek the help of the giantess Hyrrokin, whose name has been explained to mean “thunderstorm.” Here we have reminiscence of how, when the funeral pyre of Patroclus would not burn, Aeolus sent the winds to fan the flame. The Eddaic legend of Balder consists of these elements modified by vague reminiscences of what the Western Vikings learnt in Ireland and England about the brightness and purity of Christ’s life and his sad death- all of which we find again in Balder. In the later legend Hodr is represented as blind, evidently answering to the blind Longinus who, in the Middle-Age tradition, pierces Christ’s side with a spear. The incident of the gods shooting and hewing at Balder seems to be based on the Gospel narrative of Christ’s being struck with a reed (arundo). The word arundo also means “arrow,” and in the Old-English Vision of the Rood the Cross itself says, “I was pierced with arrows.” Here, as elsewhere, the Old-English Chrisitian poetry is really more original and archaic than the heathen mythology of the Scandinavians. The incident of the whole of nature, both animate and inanimate, weeping over Balder (Christ) occurs frequently in the Middle-Age writings, and is based on a homily of Gregory. Even the detail of the mistletoe can be traced back to a Jewish[sic Judean] tradition.
In another meeting of the same society Dr. A. Bang read a paper on the Voluspa, in which he came independently to similar results. He proved that the Voluspa is an adaptation- in some passages almost a translation- of the pseudo-Sibylline prophecies, the earliest of which (second century B.C.) was written with a view to pave the way for the Jewish [sic Judean] ideas among educated heathens, a style of composition which was afterwards employed with great success in the service of Christianity. These Christian oracles were based on ancient Greek myths, Jewish [sic Israelite] apocryphal legends, and Biblical books, especially the Prophets and Book of Revelation. They are always divided into two parts. The poet makes the Sibyl first proclaim her knowledge of the past, and then pronounce her oracles about the future. Dr. Bang then went on to show the thorough-going resemblance both of the general plan and the details of the Voluspa, whose very name is a translation of Oraculum Sibyllae.
I will now add a few remarks of my own. Startling as these results may at first sight appear, it is only because they shock our prejudices. Now that it is generally admitted that (as was the first distinctly stated by Edzardi) the skaldic metres are of purely Celtic origin, while Sievers has shown that the Eddaic metres contain the same Celtic elements, the hypothesis of a corresponding influence on the mythology is, a priori, not only possible, but highly probably. That the heathen mythology of the Anglo-Saxons was largely influenced by that of Greece and Rome is shown by the name of the week, Saternes daeg; and that the other gods and heroes were perfectly familiar to them is shown by such popular forms and Muntgiof (Mons Jovis). The Old-English name of the Alps, Ercol (Hervules), called Ercol se ent (giant) in Alfred’s translation of Orosius. Prof. Bugge believes that the phol of the German Merseburg charm is simply Apollo. There is no reason why these names should not be considered as common Teutonic, introduced by direct communication with the Romans- perhaps by the same German mercenaries who brought home such words as mile, street, pound, inch, &c. Although the result of these discoveries will be to depose Norse mythology from its proud positon of representative of the original Teutonic beliefs, tho value of that mythology as an exponent of Norse character and thought will not in any way be diminished. On the contrary, we shall learn to admire still more its harmony and grandeur, and the skill with which the edifice has been built up out of so many discordant materials. The working-up of these materials is certainly profoundly original- for more so, for instance, than the Latin adaptations of Greek myths.
Bugge. (1879, November 29). On the Origin of Norse Mythology. Academy, 14, 396. Retrieved October 17, 2016
Orthodox State of Israel
The Encyclopedia Judaica describes the current reli- gious picture of the nation of Israel.
There are very few Reform or Conservative congregations in the State of Israel. Orthodoxy is the official religious position in Israel with the majority of the rabbis belonging to the old school of Talmudic jurists.
(“Judaism.” Encyclopedia Judaica, pg. 396)
The tendency within the Jewish Theological Seminary [in New York] has been emphatically . . . toward a more orthodox stance than existed within it in the previous generation.
(“Conservative Judaism,” Enc. Encyclopedia Judaica, pg. 906)
Past Pope Views on the Jews
Gregory IX. Condemned the Talmud as containing “every kind of vileness and blasphemy against Christian doctrine.”
Benedict XIII. His Bull on the Jews (1450) declared, “The heresies, vanities and errors of the Talmud prevent the Jews from knowing the truth.”
Innocent IV. Burned the Talmud in 1233 as a book of evil.
John XXII. Banned the Talmud in 1322
Julius III. Papal Bull Contra Hebreos retinentes Libros (1554) ordered the Talmud burnt “everywhere.”
Paul IV. Bull Cum Nimis Absurdum (1555) powerfully condemned Jewish usury and anti-Christian activities.
Pius IV. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.
Pius V. Expelled all Jews from papal states. (1569)
Gregory XIII. Said in a Papal Bull of 1581, “Moved by an intense hatred of the members of Christ, they continue to plan horrible crimes against the Christian religion with daily increasing audacity.”
Clement VIII. Condemned Jewish genocidal writings.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
“It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States, but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type…”
Captain Schuyler, American army intelligence officer in Russia during the revolution. (in his official report)
Russian Revolution was Jewish
The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 per- cent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide social revolution. — David Francis, American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the Revolution
Russian Revolution was Jewish
in the first government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews out of a total of 384 Commissars.
U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American
Expeditionary Forces, June 9.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
Its chief financier was in fact the New York Jewish Capitalist, and extreme Jewish supremacist Jacob Schiff
Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
The chief correspondent of the London Times in Russia at the time described it as nothing short of an “alien invasion” and takeover of Russia by Jews.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
The same was said by our American ambassador to Russia, David Francis,
Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C.
Scribner’s & Sons. p.214.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
Winston Churchill described the Russian Revolution as a takeover by Bolshevik Jews that had “…seized the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire.”
Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the
Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8.
Russian Revolution was Jewish
“There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews.”
• The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
a lengthy report dated July 16, 1919, on Bolshevism abroad called A Monthly Review of the Progress of Revolutionary Movements Abroad
Russian Revolution was Jewish
The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s and during and after World War II…. Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet Regime…. The great attraction of Communism among Russian, and later also, Western Jewry, emerged only with the establishment of the Soviet Regime in Russia…
Many Jews the world over therefore regarded the Soviet concept of the solution to the “Jewish question” as an intrinsically positive approach…. Communism became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist International to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right wing propaganda that presented Communism an alien, Jewish conspiracy.
– Encyclopedia Judaica. p.791-792.
Stalin A Jew:
Joseph Stalin’s real name is Djugashvili,which translates from Georgian as, “son of a Jew.” In the Georgian language, “shvili,” means son of, and, “Djuga,” means Jew. Stalin also has three wives in his lifetime. Ekaterina Svanidze, Kadya Allevijah, and Rosa
Kaganovich, all of them Jewesses. Interestingly Stalin passes a law during his premiership that resulted in anyone found guilty of anti-Semitism being sentenced to death.
Stalin Controlled By Jews:
Jewish Lazar Kaganovich is not just another member of the Politbureau he is Stalin’s brother-in-law, and his chief advisor. His daughter is Stalin’s wife.
(-13th November 1934 the newspaper The Moment)
Talmud Supreme Authority For Judaism
Thus the ultimate authority for Orthodoxy is the Babylonian Talmud. The Bible itself ranks second to it in reality, if not in theory.
(Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, “Authority” pg. 637)
Talmud as Basis of Judaism
“The Talmud is, then, the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders.”
Rabbi Michael L. Rodkinsohn
Talmud as Basis of Judaism
The American Heritage Dictionary describes it as “constituting the basis of religious authority for traditional Judaism.”
Talmud as Basis of Judaism
Herman Wouk, the very popular Jewish writer describes the Talmud as follows:
The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart’s blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe — whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or merely spasmodic sentimentalists — we follow the Talmud. It is our common law.
The Talmud: The Heart’s Blood of The Jewish Faith
New York Herald Tribune. (1959). Nov. 17.
Talmud looked at by non-Jews punished with death
A heathen who pries into the Torah [and other Jewish Scriptures] is condemned to death, for it is written, it is our inheritance, not theirs. (Sanhedrin 59a)
Talmud, Sanhedrin. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.400.
Talmud- Non Jews are animals
Only Jews are human. [Gentiles] are animals. (Baba Mezia 114a- 114b.)
Talmud. (1935). Soncino Edition.
Talmud on Murder
For murder, whether of a Cuthean [Gentile] by a Cuthean, or of an Israelite by a Cuthean, punishment is incurred; but of a Cuthean by an Israelite, there is no death penalty. (Sanhedrin 57a)
Talmud. (1935). Soncino Edition. P.388
Talmud on killing non-Jews
Even the best of the [Gentiles] should be killed. ( Babylonian Talmud)
Funk And Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile. New York. p.617.
Talmud on “evil”
If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there. (Moed Kattan 17a.)
Talmud. (1935). Baba Mezia. Soncino Edition. 114a-114b.
Talmud on non-Jew flesh
Gentiles’ flesh is as the flesh of asses and whose issue is like the issue of horses.
Funk And Wagnalls Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Gentile. New York. p.621.
Talmud on non-Jew who hits a Jew
If a heathen [non-Jew] hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is hitting God. (Sanhedrin 58b.)
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 58b. p.398.
Talmud Jews claiming to be Israelites and double standard
If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite [Gentile] gores an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full. (Baba Kamma 37b.)
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.211.
Talmud no need to return lost items of non-Jews
If a Jew finds an object lost by a heathen it does not have to be returned. (Baba Mezia 24a; Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b.)
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.666.
Talmud on who God will not spare
God will not spare a Jew who ‘marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean [Gentile]… (Sanhedrin 76a.)
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 76a. p.470.
Talmud on theft of non-Jews
What a Jew obtains by theft from a Cuthean [non-Jew] he may keep. (Sanhedrin 57a.)
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 57a. p.388.
Talmud on exploitation of non-Jews
[Gentiles] are outside the protection of the law and God has ‘exposed their money to Israel.’ (Baba Kamma 37b.)
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. 37b.
Talmud on Jews lying to non-Jews
Jews may use lies (‘subterfuges’) to circumvent a [Gentile]. (Baba Kamma 113a.)
Talmud, Baba Kamma. (1935). Soncino Edition. p.664-665.
Talmud on non-Jew children being animals
All [Gentile] children are animals. (Yebamoth 98a.)
Talmud, Yebamoth. (1936). Soncino Edition. 98a.
Talmud Saying non-Jews prefer sex with cows
[Gentiles] prefer sex with cows. (Abodah Zarah 22a-22b.)
Talmud, Abodah Zarah. (1935). Soncino Edition. 22a-b.
Talmud on food of non-Jews
The vessels of [Gentiles], do they not impart a worsened flavor to the food cooked in them? (Abodah Zarah 67b.)
Talmud, Abodah Zarah. (1935). Soncino Edition. 67b.
Talmud lies about virgin Mary
The Talmud describes the Virgin Mary as a whore.
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p.726.
Talmud lies about Yah(sh)ua
The Talmud accuses Christ of having sexual intercourse with his donkey.
Talmud, Sanhedrin (1935). Soncino Edition. 105a-b. p.717.
Talmud Treatment of Yah(sh)ua
Balaam [Yah(sh)ua commonly called Jesus] is raised from the dead and being punished in boiling hot semen. Those who mock the words of the Jewish sages and sin against Israel are boiled in hot excrement. (57a Gittin)
Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press. p.261
Balaam [Yahshua] fornicated with his jackass. (Sanhedrin 105a- b)
Jewish priests raised Balaam [Yahshua] from the dead and punished him in boiling hot semen.(57a Gittin)
She who was the descendant of princes and governors [The Virgin Mary] played the harlot with a carpenter (Sanhedrin 106a)
[Yahshua] was lowered into a pit of dung up to his armpits. Then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead. (Sanhedrin 52b)
Also, says they gave him four different executions in Sanhedrin 106a.
Hast thou heard how old Balaam [Yahshua] was?”…bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old. (Sanhedrin 106)
Those who read the uncanonical books [New Testament] will have no portion in the world to come. (Sanhedrin 90a)
Talmud says destroy books of Christians
Jews must destroy the books of the [Christians]. (Shabbath 116a)
Talmud word Balaam is synonym for Yah(sh)ua
In The Jewish Encyclopedia, under the heading “Balaam,” it says, “…the pseudonym ‘Balaam’ given to Jesus[Yah(sh)ua] in Sanhedrin 106b and Gittin 57a.”
Jewish Encyclopedia. (1907). Balaam. p.469.
Was Ham black?
Certainly not. The judgment was upon Canaan who was the result of Ham uncovering the nakedness of his father Noah. This term is defined by Scripture and means that he had sex with Noah’s wife (who was also probably drunk). The brothers discovered this which is why they walked backwards to cover their mother. In those time family members of the same gender would have bathed together and so seeing their father naked wouldn’t have been a big deal. However, it would have been a shame to have seen their mother naked. Noah cursed not Ham, but the offspring in his wife’s womb from the illicit union. Canaan was cursed. We have other white Hamites founding Egypt, etc.
Who did Cain marry?
It is quite clear that Cain did not marry one of Adam’s children. Before any such children were born, Cain declared “everyone that findeth me shall slay me.” Now one would think the earth being as big as it is, would certainly be enough for Cain to get away. God knew that Cain’s fear was rational which is why he put a mark on Cain. His fear was rational because there were other people alive at the time who were savages (Pre-Adamites). Some say that the pre-Adamites are mere beasts and any hatred is caused by the Jews. If this is so, then why would Cain himself and evil man who killed Abel be afraid of them? These pre-Adamics did not know of Cain’s crime so the only reason they would want to kill Cain is because they are savages. They have hatred in their very hearts and a base desire to kill.
We see in Genesis 4:16 that Cain went and dwelt in Nod east of Eden. It does not say that Cain built Nod but that he dwelt there. This possibly suggests that the land already had a name due to people living there. Interestingly enough however, Nod and Vagabond(which Cain was) so could have been named after the fact. Scripture seems to suggest that as soon as Cain left the area where Adam and Eve lived, he immediately went to the land of Nod and knew his wife and she conceived and bare Enoch. Some say that verse 16 and 17 could have allowed for a great period of time to pass. Sure a small amount of time had to pass for him to get to Nod. However, Cain had a fear that he would be killed.
We see that Adam and Eve are not said to have had any daughters whatsoever until after the birth of Seth which was after Cain had already had children. Why would a daughter of Adam and Eve be allowed to go marry Cain and why would they even want to risk their own lives in fear of other people or even a fear of Cain since Cain already murdered Abel? Furthermore, Cain built a town named after his son Enoch as mentioned in Genesis 4:17. Do the Judeo-Christians when saying that Cain married his sister also suggest that many of Adam and Eve’s children were disobedient to their parents enough to go make a town with Cain who murdered Abel? Shouldn’t they have fear that they might also be murdered?
Words on Jews by Moses Hess
[Moses Hess was a teacher of Karl Marx and the spiritual father of both Zionism and Communism] “We Jews shall always remain strangers among the Goyim [non-Jews]. . . . It is a fact the Jewish religion is above all Jewish nationalism. . . . Each and every Jew, whether or not he wishes it, is automatically, by virtue of his birth, bound in solidarity with his entire nation. . . . One must be a Jew first and human being second.”
Hess, Moses, (1958). 1812-1875. Rome And Jerusalem. Translated By
Maurice J. Bloom. New York: Philosophical Library.
WW2 Jewish calls to rape and murder German women and children:
The Soviet propaganda minister during the war was a Jew, Ilya Ehrenburg, who notoriously distinguished himself by his Second World War exhortations of Soviet troops to rape and murder the women and children of Germany.
Hoffman, Michael. (1997). Campaign for Radical Truth in History.
Ehrenburg won the Order of Lenin and the Stalin Prize and willed his papers to the Israeli Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum.
Genocide in Scripture
And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:21)
Then Horam, king of Gezer, came to help Lachish; and Joshua smote him and all his people, until he had left him none remaining.
And they took Eglon, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and all the souls that were therein. (Joshua 10:32-34)
And they took Hebron, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and the king thereof, and all the cities thereof, and the souls that were therein; he left none remaining. (Joshua 10:37)
For the indignation of the Lord is upon all nations, and His fury upon all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, He hath de- livered them to the slaughter.
Their slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted in their blood. (Isaiah 34:2-3)
But in the cities of these peoples that the Lord your God gives you for an inheritance, you shall save alive nothing that breathes, (Deuteronomy 20:16)
Israelites Not to Race Mix
Neither shall thou make marriages with them; their daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son. (Deuteronomy 7:2-3)
Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever, that ye may be strong and eat of the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever. (Ezra 9:12)
Israelites Chosen Above All People
. . .For thou art a holy people unto the Lord Thy God: the Lord Thy God has chosen thee to a special people unto himself, above all people that are on the face of the earth. (Deuteronomy 7:6)
Why was Dan not included in the 144,000?
*Paper read at an Anglo-Israel meeting in 1874, and printed in an extended form in the Hebrew Christian Witness, July, 1875.
This usual answer of commentators is (see Alford) that Dan was the first to fall into idolatry, and that it would, therefore, be obliterated.
This may be at once disposed of as incorrect by a reference to Ezekiel 48, where, in the division of the land which has never yet taken place, Dan comes in for this share at the head of the list; therefore, at that blessed time, Dan will still be as much in favour with God as any of the other tribes.
The error possibly has arisen, in some measure, from assuming that the sealing mentioned is to take place at the day of judgment, or at the ushering in of some new dispensation. This view also has been favoured by the picture in the last part of the chapter -viz., the countless multitude with palms in their hands, who are generally supposed to represent saved Gentiles. Commentators have often satisfied themselves with this interpretation: that the saved Gentiles shall be countless, but that the saved of Abraham’s seed – of him to whom so much was promised – are only to amount to 144,000 – less than an average army of a first-class European state, and less than a quarter of the number of fighting men alone who came out of Egypt under Moses upwards of 3,000 years ago! Why, so long ago in Elijah’s day, God had reserved to Himself in Israel 7,000 men “who had not bowed the knee to Baal.”
A very brief examination of the vision of the seals (Rev. 5-9) will show (1st) that the sealing took place during an interlude between the sixth and seventh seals; and (2nd) that the object of the sealing was to preserve alive upon the earth certain of God’s people – Israel – during certain calamities which were about to be brought upon the earth under the seventh seal.
Similar instances are the blood over the door in Egypt, which secured the inmates against the destroying angel (Exod. 12:23); see a sealing also (Ezek. 9:4-6); see also Rev. 9:4, where in one of the judgments of the seventh seal, and under the fifth trumpet, it is distinctly said that they were “not to hurt… but only those men which have not the seal of God on their foreheads.”
It will now be asked, Who, then are the countless multitude with palms in their hands of ver. 9? To this I conceive the answer to be that it is customary in the Word of God, wherever calamities are foretold (see especially Isaiah), to follow them up with verses or a whole chapter of comfort and blessing; and in the present case, ver. 9 to the end of the chapter is, I think, a glimpse of heaven, depicting, for the comfort and assurance of the Church on earth when trouble and danger threaten, the perfect peace and comfort of those who endure faithfully to the end. Thus the first part of the chapter gives warning of the tribulation impending, and takes precautions for the safety of the elect, and the last part of the chapter holds up to view the reward.
Let us now see if there is anything to show where these 144,000 could have been at the time of the sealing.
To elucidate this, let us examine the sixth chapter, which details the events under the first to the sixth seals.
As each seal was broken, there was exhibited to St. John, as it were, a picture, each of which pictures the apostle describes, recording, at the same time, utterances which sometimes accompanied the exhibition. The six seals are in this way broken in succession, the first of which is considered by many commentators to be an assuring symbol of the progress and triumph of the Kingdom of Christ;* the other five being, by the consent of commentators, from whom I see no reason to differ, events now historical and well identified – fearful wars, principally affecting Greeks, Romans, and Jews – scarcity of food – dreadful persecutions and massacres of Christians, including the period known as the era of martyrs (A.D. 270-304), and the last fierce struggle with Paganism against Christianity, which ended in the triumph of Constantine, A.D. 323.
*Elliott, however, believes that the white horse must be Rome; but if so, what of Rev. 19:11?
The verses at the close of the sixth chapter, being the end of the sixth seal, describing the terror of the followers of Paganism, have led casual readers to suppose that it represents the end of the world – the last day; buy it is clearly not so. For whatever be the interpretation, there still remains the long string of judgments to be accomplished upon the earth under the seventh seal.
Why, then, were these 144,000 of Israel (omitting Dan) to be sealed now, after the sixth seal and just before the seventh? One must infer that the judgments hitherto, which embraced the period called the “Era of Martyrs,” and which extended over the whole Roman Empire, including Egypt and Syria, had not materially affected them, or surely they would have been sealed at the outset.
If we accept the Scythians and Goths as representing Israel we get out of this difficulty at once. Between the Danube and the Don they had enjoyed for centuries wonderful security. They had spread south of the Danube, and had there, it is true, come into fierce collision with the Romans, sometimes triumphing, sometimes failing but the heart of their country had never been penetrated.
Keatinge, the Irish historian, rejoicing that Ireland was partly peopled by batches of Scythians or Scots from Gothland in the Euxine, says at p. 54:
“Justin, the abbreviator of Trogus, gives this glorious account of the Scythian nation: – ‘The Scythians were always free from attempts of any other nation, or came off conquerors when they were attacked. They drove Darius, the Persian king, out of Scythia, who was glad to save himself by a cowardly and ingenious flight. They killed Cyrus and his whole army and his whole army. They fought with the same success against Zopyron, one of Alexander’s generals, and destroyed him and all his forces. They have heard indeed of the arms of the Romans, but never felt them.’ A character that no other people of the world so eminently deserved, and which we have no reason to suspect of partiality, as it came from an author who was a Roman.”
Thus then, on the north of the Black Sea, the Goths and Scythians had been entirely out of the way of judgments under the first six seals. Christianity had taken root among them; there was a Gothic bishop present at the council of Nicea, A.D. 325, Uphilas, who had translated the Lord’s prayer and the greater part if the Bible into Moeso Gothic.
What was now to happen that the sealing should take place before the opening of the seventh seal? It is remarkable, and it is strong evidence in favour of the Identity of the Goths or Scythians with Israel, that, by all commentators, the events under the first trumpet (i.e., on the opening of the seventh seal) are held to be the irruption of the Goths upon the Roman Empire, A.D. 338-412. They had been surging up for some years, and now, pressed upon in the East by Huns, they burst forth upon the West. As if God, before He put His host, His “sanctified ones” (Isa. 13:3), His special hidden instruments, in motion (“Thou art My battle axe”) to execute His purpose, had numbered 144,000 of them to Himself, to preserve a people to Himself, and a seed to Abraham, out of the myriads exposed to evil.
Why then was not Dan sealed?
The Calamities against which the sealing was a safeguard, and in which the Goths were the instruments used by the Almighty, were to sweep over the Roman Empire. But if we accept as a fact that Dan, instead of being led away by the Assyrian conquerors and wandering about with the other Tribes, making long land journeys, preferred to take to his ships, abandoning Palestine, Greece, and the Black Sea, as enemies made them too hot and unsafe, and to seek the secure and remote West, destined by God as Israel’s sanctuary, then, there is a plain reason why it was not necessary why this Tribe should be sealed, for it was not endangered. Denmark, Devonshire (Danonnia,) Scotland, and Ireland were not within the theatre of operations.”
(Dan The Pioneer of Israel by Colonel J.C. Gawler pp. 46-50)