See if you can crack these puzzles.
from:https://joedubs.com/pedagogic
SJW:
Alt Right Maths:
Nubian Brain Busters:
Bigoted Brain-Busters
Why should an English speaking person call on the Hebrew names of Yahweh and Yahushua?
via: Don Brown
This is a question that is often asked. Why should an English speaking person call on the Hebrew names of Yahweh and Yahushua?
The answer is actually quite simple. Personal names do not translate across languages. For instance, Vladimir Putin is still Vladimir Putin in any country or language. Personal names do not translate, they transliterate.
To transliterate is to retain the original pronunciation as much as possible. Have you ever listened to a news broadcast in a foreign language? You’ll hear a bunch of unintelligible words until they bring up names like “George Bush.” This is because names transliterate, not translate.
Even so, “The LORD” is not even a translation of the name “Yahweh”, it is a direct replacement.
Put simply, the translators admit they substituted Yahweh’s name for a title. All for the sake of an tradition. Yahweh’s name is in scripture nearly 7000 times. And nearly 7000 times they replaced it (not translated it) with “the LORD”, or “GOD”. Imagine that? They took His name out of His own book!
I wouldn’t want someone to change my name unless it was Yahweh, and it is clear that according to the third commandment Yahweh doesn’t want anyone to change or falsify His name either.
Think about this for a moment. What makes man think he has the authority to change the name of the one who created him, and who created all things? We don’t have that right! For instance, in the scriptures we see that one who changes the name of another is always in authority over them. The Messiah renamed Simon. Yahweh renamed Abram to Abraham. He renamed Jacob to Israel. Adam named the animals. Even we name our children, not the other way around. Yahweh, our Heavenly Father, named His Son ‘Yahushua’ in .
– “And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Yahushua [a name meaning, “Yahweh saves”], for He will save His people from their sins.”
Yahweh named His son after Himself. Every time we use His original name we are declaring that “Yahweh saves” us. The name “Jesus” has no such meaning.
The bottom line is we have no authority to rename or alter the Messiah’s name, or the name of Yahweh the Father. We need to leave things just as He inspired it.
For any who might say, “Well I don’t speak Hebrew so I’ll use an English name” consider this: If you don’t speak Hebrew then you can’t say Abraham, Isaac, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Obadiah, Zechariah, Michael or a long list of other Hebrew names! Why was Yahweh’s name the only one changed? And why was Yahushua’s Name the only name in our modern bibles that is vastly different from the Old Testament to the New Testament? In the Old Testament, it’s “Joshua” but in the New Testament it’s “Jesus”.
The answer is simple: Tradition.
Does it matter? Yes, because truth always matters to a believer. The apostles were preaching and teaching and baptizing and doing all things in the name Yahushua. This is what He is called in heaven, never “Jesus.”
Yahweh’s Name IS truth. Yahushua’s Name IS truth. Substitutions and alterations are not truth. Yahweh is seeking those who worship Him in spirit and in truth. When call upon His true name, we are worshipping Him in truth.
So if we know that “the Lord” and “Jesus” are not truth, why would we continue in error?? Aren’t we supposed to love the truth?
But maybe you are thinking, “Okay so do you have any scriptures that show that Gentiles should be calling on His name?” I am glad you asked….
Malachi 1:11 For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great among the heathen (Heb. Gentiles), saith Yahweh of hosts.
Acts 9:15 But the Master said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
Acts 15:14 Simeon hath declared how Elohim at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
Larry Silverstein is a very very lucky man
Lucky Larry
2,977 innocent people died on 9/11. Nothing can express the loss experienced by the families of the victims.
One man, however, made several billion dollars in insurance from the destruction of the World Trade Center. That man is property magnate Larry Silverstein Known as ‘Lucky Larry’,
Many believe he was aware of the terror attacks before they ever happened. The World Trade Center was publicly owned until July 24th, 2001, when Larry Silverstein acquired the leasehold of buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5 – including the Twin Towers. The deal gave Silverstein the World Trade Center for 99 years. The terms of the lease also meant he was entitled and obliged to rebuild the World Trade Center should the buildings be destroyed Silverstein immediately drew up new insurance policies for the World Trade Center, with 23 different insurance companies Most significantly, Silverstein changed the standard policy on the buildings to include a clause covering the occurrence of a terrorist attack. Just such an attack happened on September 11th, 2001 – fewer than two months after Silverstein took out the new insurance policy. Peculiarly, Silverstein should have been in the Twin Towers when the planes hit Silverstein ate at the Windows of the World restaurant on the top floors of the North Tower every morning – except on September 11th Silverstein says he had a doctor’s appointment instead.. In fact, by his own admission, he never left his house.
Furthermore, his two children were also due to have separate work meetings in the Twin Towers but they both were running late and avoided the attacks In addition, while firefighters battled to save the neighbouring Building 7, Silverstein ordered them to ‘pull it’, letting the building collapse. 
100 Reasons Israelites Are White
100 Proofs The Israelites Were White
:by TruthVids
1 – The Saxons aka Saac Sons
Have you ever known of any people being called after Isaac?
When God made a covenant with Abraham he also made a prophecy that the future Israelites would be called by his son Isaac’s name.
‘For in Isaac shall thy seed be called.’ Genesis 21:12
This is repeated twice again in the NT by Paul. Paul very aware of the reality of where the lost tribes of Israel were:
“Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.” Romans 9:7
“Of whom it was said, That in Isaac shall thy seed be called:
” Hebrews 11:18
So which race today is named after Isaac? Who was Paul referring to?
In the name Saxons the “i” has been dropped and the basic part of the word “sak” or “sac” has been retained. “Son” simply means son of. So the word “Saxons” means “sons of (I)SAC” or “sons of Isaac.
The Anglo Saxons or white race today spread out across the world are the real true descendants of Isaac and inherited all of the promises made to Abraham. God’s prophecy still holds true after 4000 years!
2 – They would follow the 10 commandments
Ever since the 10 Commandments were given to Moses on Mount Sinai, only 1 race has consistently followed them all the way up to this day.
You find Law & Order in every white society.
The ‘Common Law’ we have today was built upon these very 10 commandments. You find it in every white society but completely absent in any others races countries and laws.
Whites are the true and only descendants of the Israelites! Continue reading “100 Reasons Israelites Are White”
A writing to the Judeo Christians
I often wonder why the Western world is declining. Many others would say the same thing. In fact, we would probably agree that our culture is deteriorating. The problem is, a lot of examples that would be brought up in a conversation are very superficial. Why superficial? Because some are too afraid to talk about the real problems plaguing our world. Not just afraid to talk, they will be in a state of denial and cognitive dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance is defined as a mental discomfort experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. This discomfort is triggered by a situation in which a belief of a person clashes with new evidence perceived by that person. When confronted with facts that contradict personal beliefs, ideals, and values, people will find a way to resolve the contradiction in order to reduce their discomfort.As a culture, we cannot solve the problems unless we get to the bottom of it. Who? What? When? Where? Why? Sometimes these questions are very difficult to answer. Stopping a symptom will not solve the problem. Eliminating the cause will.
Modern day Western civilization has a tendency to be very weak, forgiving and accepting. The past century is living proof of that. If you can honestly look outside your window and tell yourself that everything is amazing, you are being very dishonest with yourself. I know people will point fingers and tell us what the main problem is, yet no one can change that. There is no physical way that these problems will be solved. It all becomes a talking point at the dinner table, television and other sources of communication. Of course these talking points turn into debates, which can get heated and emotional. At times it splits friendships, relationships and families a part. For what? The common denominator of these talking points stems from two major topics. Politics and religion.
I often wonder centuries before, if this would cause so much division in our ancestors’ lives? I highly doubt it. They focused on family and community, having their faith as their foundation. There was no television to huddle around, these families found ways of improving their life and doing activities together. Now a days you will rarely see this. Many families are broken, forced to work long hours to survive. Divorce rates are through the roof. Being a single parent is pretty much the norm now a days. It doesn’t seem like we are evolving in the proper direction right?
I mentioned before about the two major topics of politics and religion. Politics is a beast of a topic to discuss. You can write millions of pages on it. We can leave that up to those who enjoy politics to do. My major concern is religion. Now! I am concerned about religion. Immediately a good chunk of people will classify me as an atheist, agnostic or even an apologetic. I am neither of these.
I titled this article ‘A writing to the Judeo Christians’ for a reason. Loads of people will get confused by it, not knowing what it truly means. I shall summarize it with one word, ‘churchianity’. Basically every church that is denominational, non- denominational and Catholic. Further in this writing it will be quite clear what the main title is about. Some understand what it means, the best to you!
I would like to dive into various questions and comments about the ‘churchianity’ world. I know some will not like the topics because it tests their faith and belief. These questions are tough! Yet many are asking the same questions and never get a full honest answer.
I.
Is It This Or Is It That? – Welcome To Churchianity
The Origins of Adam and Our Adversaries
by: Sloan Sutherland
To understand our current plight as Christians we must have an understanding of the origins of not only ourselves, but of our adversaries. After the creation of Adam and his placement in the garden of Eden there was to be found a tree of knowledge of good and evil. Many understand this tree to be literal. Some understand it to be symbolic, but what is the symbolism?
It is evident in numerous places all throughout the prophets and the New Testament that trees, vines and other plant life symbolize people, families, nations and races. We will now establish this idiom (particularly as pertaining to nations and races) with a few examples from Scripture.
Here the prophet Jeremiah speaks of the fornication of Israel in mingling with the other nations: Continue reading “The Origins of Adam and Our Adversaries”
R E A D S E I G E
“Another thesis I’ve developed with regard to major social and cultural institutions is this: Nothing ever starts out as bullshit but, left in the hands of man, everything usually winds up as bullshit. Such is the case with Christianity. Early Christianity, exactly like National Socialism, was born out of dire necessity. Jesus of Nazareth was the right man in the right place at the right time. During my years of lock-up I annotated at least six Bibles and I found the big left turn that everybody misses, rendering the whole thing as a waste of time. The Exodus of Moses was the last three million Whites getting out of decadent and dying Egypt. They militarily seized for themselves the most north-easterly province of Egypt, which was Canaan. Of course, they renamed it after themselves: Israel, meaning a prince ruling with God. There they found dark native inhabitants. God commanded they should kill all of these people. But they failed to do this, instead making slaves of them. Over much time they integrated them into their society. And with White, Israelite men chasing after these colored, Canaanite women, racial Jews were born. The word “Jew” isn’t even mentioned in the Bible until Second Kings, Chapter 16, Verse 6. “ – James Mason (author of SEIGE)
“Throughout the early to mid 1980s. Its contents were edited and published by Michael Moynihan as Siege: The Collected Writings of James Mason. He advocated leaderless resistance, calling for autonomous action by individuals rather than an authoritarian hierarchical organization. Continue reading “R E A D S E I G E”
A Collection of the Musings Of Sloan Sutherland
Part 1. Concerning the Veracity of the Christian Scriptures
People really underestimate the antiquity, veracity and general merit of the Christian Scriptures. Before the earliest Greek poets were writing Moses was aware of tribes identifiable by ancestors he knew by name as far away as Spain, and Russia. He identifies some of the earliest known tribes of Europe like the Tartesians, Rhodians, Ionians, Thracians and Lydians as well as White tribes of the Near East like the Medes, Persians and Egyptians among others. Greek writers highly esteemed Moses and likened him to notable Aryan leaders and law givers like Zalmoxis, Midas, Lycurgis and Zoroaster. The extant Greek Old Testament (Septuagint aka LXX) dates to the 3rd century BC and has never left Aryan textual tradition since Moses penned the original (likely proto-Sinaitic) Pentateuch. The Greek New Testament is the best attested ancient manuscript, surpassing all the Greek classics in the quantity and quality of it’s textual witnesses. It has always been preserved primarily in Western literary tradition and has never left it. These texts were the guiding light for our European ancestors. Don’t underestimate them or scoff at them.
Part 2. The Shemitic Origin of Europa
The same WN pagans who say ancient Shemites like Abraham or Christos were racial Iews like to say “European pride”, “native European religion”, and call their land “mother Europa”.
But they don’t know that Europa was a Shemitic Phoenician-Israelite from Palestine. A White Shemite gave Europe its name. Pagans must therefore either abandon the term Europe since they condemn ancient Shemites as racially alien, or accept that the Shemites were White.
Other ancient Hellenic heroes, gods and demigods of Shemitic-Phoenician origin include Heracles, Dionysus, Semele, the Cabiri, Oedipus, Phoenix, Minos, Sarpedon, Rhadamanthys, Phineus and Adonis. Continue reading “A Collection of the Musings Of Sloan Sutherland”
Pre-Adamites: Humanoids Before The First White Man
A commonly held misbeLIEf held by Jewdeo-Xians is that Adam was the first man upon earth.
Adam was not the first man, but the first Adamite, the first White man.
The Pre-Adamite Earth : A contribution to theological science
by Harris, John, 1870
https://archive.org/details/preadamiteearthc187000harr
PRE-ADAMITE MAN; The Story of our Old Planet and its Inhabitants, told by Scripture & Science
Continue reading “Pre-Adamites: Humanoids Before The First White Man”
Merchants of Sin with Aryan Narrations
From the book ‘Merchants of Sin’ by Benjamin Garland.
Aryan narrations provided by Sven Longshanks.
Part O: Introduction
https://merchants-of-sin.com/introduction/
The Jews never faced much anti-Semitism in America. This is due, in large part, to the underlying ideologies it was founded on; namely, universalistic interpretations of Christianity and Enlightenment ideals of freedom, equality and opportunity for all.
These principles, which were arguably created with noble intent – and based on the values inherent in a society of European-descended peoples of high moral character – crippled the defenses of the individualistic-minded White natives and gave the Jews free reign to consolidate power at a rather alarming rate, virtually unchecked. Continue reading “Merchants of Sin with Aryan Narrations”